RIN Blog
Blog Home All Blogs

Feed the world - getting the grain out of Ukraine

Posted By James Taylor OBE FRIN, 27 July 2022

Well, just for a moment it was looking good.  Well, if not good, at least a bit better.  Agreement had been reached between Ukraine and the Russian Federation (RF) under the auspices of Turkey as gate-keeper of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles under the Montreux Convention, for a re-start to the export of grain from 3 Ukrainian ports, but most notably, Odessa.  The lack of this grain is driving countries into food poverty, and the continuation of grain shipping is, literally,  vital, especially in the Horn of Africa, where famine looms, and in Egypt.  The world's reliance on Ukraine as a bread basket is massive.  Getting grain cargoes out of Ukraine will not  be without risk, from mines, or from intervention by Russian warships; war is never without risk.  But at least we had some form of agreement.


Which makes Russia's missile attack within 24 hours of the agreement, on the port facilities of Odessa a new high water mark of brutal and violent cynicism, even by Russian standards. We learned today that there is every chance that grain exports will re-start soon, which pays tribute to the remarkable resilience of Ukraine, but this vital work needs to be supported and facilitated and made as safe as is reasonable in the circumstances. Ships, long held in Ukrainian ports since the start of the war, will need technical and personnel support. Safe channels will need to be charted and marked, physically or virtually.  Aids to navigation must have added resilience.   So I'm asking maritime colleagues to prod their organisations, Associations, Institutes, Chambers of Shipping and Government departments to help make this happen.  If we do not, then very many people, people without number, will starve.  We can help prevent that. 


James Taylor OBE FRIN


IAIN delegate to IMO & RIN Council member
 

 

Tags:  Aids to Navigation  Maritime  Resilience  Shipping  Ukraine 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Note on a meeting of IMO NCSR9: 21 – 30 June 2022

Posted By Kim Fisher, 04 July 2022

by Kim Fisher

The meeting of the sub-committee on Navigation, Communications, Search and Rescue was held as a remote meeting under the chairmanship of the new chair, Nigel Clifford of New Zealand. The remote working again limited the time available for the meeting. Some items had been dealt with by correspondence before the meeting and two items, generic performance standards for satellite navigation receivers and revision to Voyage Data Recorder standards were postponed to the next meeting.

A late document from Ukraine was exceptionally added to the agenda. This described the difficulties of managing Search and Rescue operations in warzone areas and requested developing suitable provisions for the next meeting of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 106). NCSR members were invited to work with Ukraine on these developments

The previous meeting had completed the revision of Chapter IV (Radiocommunications) of the International Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and this meeting completed some supporting Circulars. A report was available concerning the assessment of the Chinese satellite system, BDMSS, proposed to be integrated into the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) as a recognised mobile satellite system alongside Inmarsat and Iridium. The report concluded that BDMSS should be able to meet the IMO requirements but, due to Covid restrictions, it had not been possible to visit China to conduct an on-site assessment. It was therefore proposed to request MSC 106 to consider the issue when all the information was available. There was insufficient time to consider the proposed revision of the resolution A.1001(25) used for the assessment and a correspondence group was established to be led by France. 

The issue of increased costs for Maritime Safety Information (MSI) providers as new GMDSS satellite service providers are recognised in addition to Inmarsat was discussed following the work of a correspondence group which reported to the last meeting of the Maritime Safety Committee. There was insufficient time to progress this work and a further correspondence group was set up to be led by Australia.

The IMO position for the next ITU World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC 23) was completed. There was insufficient time to consider ITU proposals to modify the recommendation M.1371-5 for the Automatic Identification System (AIS) and this will be progressed in a correspondence group to be led by Germany.

Revised performance standards for the electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) were completed. These facilitate the introduction of the new S-100 electronic charts but a further proposal to include electronic exchange of route information was not accepted. The Circular on guidance for good practice with ECDIS was revised to include guidance on software updates.

Revised performance standards were prepared for the long range identification and tracking system (LRIT) and also a revised NAVTEX Manual and a circular giving guidance on the dissemination of search and rescue information through the enhanced group call service.

A new issue concerning the operation of emergency personal radio devices in multiple casualty situations was addressed with a new Circular.

Changes to the SOLAS Chapter V were prepared to add a requirement for new container ships and bulk carriers over 3000 gross tonnage to be fitted with an electronic inclinometer.
 
The work of the correspondence group on Safety measures for non-SOLAS ships operating in polar waters was completed and amendments prepared to Chapter XIV of the SOLAS Convention and the Polar Code to include fishing vessels of 24 metres and above, pleasure yachts of 300 gross tonnage and above not engaged in trade, and cargo ships of 300 gross tonnage and above but below 500 gross tonnage. 

The work of the correspondence group on Revision of the Guidelines on places of refuge for ships in need of assistance was completed and a revised draft Assembly Resolution prepared.

An expert group on ship’s routing had been held in the week before the meeting. Amendments to the Traffic Separation Scheme in the approaches to the ports of Odessa and Ilichevesk Ukraine were agreed, a recommended route off Cape Shio-no-Misaki Japan was agreed, amendments to the area to be avoided off the coast of Southern California was agreed, the establishment of a no-anchoring area off Pulley Ridge Florida was agreed, and a recommendation on navigation for container ships in the traffic separation schemes off Denmark was agreed. Members were invited to review their mandatory voice reporting systems to determine if they were still required given the now universal use of AIS. A UK proposal for a new mandatory reporting system in the Pentland Firth was not agreed.

The next meeting of NCSR is planned for 8 to 17 May 2023. A meeting of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group is planned for 17 to 22 October 2022. A meeting of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 106) is planned for 2 to 11 November 2022. A meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group is planned for 5 to 9 December 2022. 

 

Tags:  IMO  International Maritime Organization  M 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Note of meeting of the International Maritime Organization Maritime Safety Committee IMO MSC105 – 20 to 29 April 2022

Posted By Kim Fisher, 03 May 2022
This was a full length eight-day meeting of the Committee but again limited to 3 hours a day using the KUDO platform. The Chair was Mrs Mayte Medina of the USA and there was again a very heavy workload with 146 input papers. Two agenda items – Goal-based standards and Any Other Business had been addressed by correspondence before the meeting to save meeting time but it was still not possible to complete the agenda.

Given the current world events an exceptional item was added to the agenda concerning the situation of seafarers affected by the hostilities in Ukraine. It was reported that at the beginning of the conflict 96 vessels from 26 flag states with 1000 seafarers on board had been locked in Ukrainian ports. This had now reduced to 84 vessels from 24 flag states with 550 seafarers on board but with reports of damaged, sunk and commandeered ships. It was proposed to generate an MSC resolution, and after a long debate this was achieved on Actions to facilitate the urgent evacuation of seafarers from the war zone area in and around the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov as a result of the Russian Federation aggression against Ukraine.

On the agenda was the adoption of amendments to Chapter IV (Radiocommunications) of the International Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and associated documents. This was the outcome of the exercise to update the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) and the performance standards for the radio equipment, a task that had been ongoing since 2009. The adoption was successfully achieved including a late proposal from China to add a requirement to receive unscheduled information broadcasts to the NAVTEX performance standards. The amendments will now be accepted on 1 July 2023 and enter into force on 1 January 2024.

Also on the agenda was Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS). A circular had been issued after the MSC103 meeting reviewing the mandatory instruments related to maritime safety and security and establishing how they would be affected by autonomous navigation. Work had continued in a Correspondence Group and was further developed by a Working Group at the meeting. This resulted in a proposal to develop a non-mandatory goal-based MASS Code limited to cargo ships as a first step. The work will be progressed by a further Correspondence Group and a new Joint MSC/LEG/FAL working group incorporating the Legal and Facilitation Committees.

Further on the agenda was the issue of cost implications for Maritime Safety Information (MSI) providers as new GMDSS service providers are recognised in addition to Inmarsat. Each new service provider will require payment for transmitting the MSI messages. A correspondence group had studied the issue and a Working Group discussed the issues further at the meeting. Whilst options for cost reduction had been identified it was not found to be possible to conclude on any particular option. The issue will now be referred to the next meeting of the sub-committee on Navigation Communications and Search and Rescue (NCSR) for further study.

The draft model regulations for domestic ferry safety prepared at the last meeting were completed and adopted as a resolution. The intent is it that these can be voluntarily and practically incorporated into national legislation to reduce accidents related to domestic ferry safety.

The proposals for new work items which had been carried over from the previous meeting were discussed but there was insufficient time to fully complete the list. Of navigation interest a proposal for Guidelines for the use of Electronic Nautical Publications (ENPs) was agreed. A proposal for Standardized digital exchange of route plans was agreed. Noting that NCSR already has an agenda item to amend the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) performance standards, it may be possible to combine this new work with the existing work. A proposal for upgrading the Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) on existing ships to the latest standards, which have a 30-day recording period, was not agreed as it was considered that the life expectancy of existing VDRs would in practice achieve the objective. In conclusion the Chair did not again rule that no further proposals for new work would be accepted until the existing backlog had been cleared but urged the members not to send any more proposals to the next meeting.

At the conclusion of the meeting, it was noted that Ms Turid Stemre of Norway and Ms Christine Gregory and Mr Hans van der Graff of the Secretariat were retiring.

The next meeting has been scheduled for 2 to 11 November 2022 and a further meeting is expected from 31 May to 9 June 2023. The next meeting of NCSR is scheduled for 21 to 30 June 2022.
 

Tags:  IMO  International Maritime Organization  Maritime 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Solent and South Branch News - Event report on “An Evening with David Barrie CB FRIN”

Posted By Graham Purchase, 07 April 2022

SOLENT & SOUTH NEWS - an event report by Graham Purchase

On February 2nd, Royal Lymington Yacht Club hosted a joint meeting with our RIN Branch: “An Evening with David Barrie CB FRIN”.  Rather than a giving a lecture, David answered questions from Dr Clare Stead & the audience.

David is a retired diplomat and is the author of 2 critically acclaimed books: “Sextant”, the story of how the sextant and its predecessors were used to map the world’s oceans; and “Incredible Journeys” which chronicles many amazing discoveries and research projects about Animal Navigation.

David said that he went to school in Lymington and is a former member of RLYC. One of his teachers was a keen entomologist and used his moth trap to interest pupils in moths and butterflies. David remembered being presented with the chrysalis of a Monarch Butterfly; a species which is now the most famous of insect navigators.

What attracted you to research the Monarch Butterfly?

Decades after my school days, I looked into the science of the extraordinary migration of Monarchs between as far North as the Canada/USA border in the Summer and a small area of just a few hectares in a remote, mountainous region to the West of Mexico City in the Winter; where they congregate in their millions. It is even more amazing that the migration involves several generations of the butterflies during the journeys. If they just followed the sun, they would fly a curved course; but to be able to fly a steady course, the Monarchs must have a ‘time-compensated sun-compass’ sense, with a sort of clock in their antennae.

Incredible Journeys covers a wide range of creatures, but which animal’s migration & navigational methods impresses you most?

Animal navigators face the same challenges as humans, and to start navigating one needs to know: Where am I now?... What is the location of the destination?... Then one can set a course to get there. The book distinguishes between two main categories: using a ‘map’-based sense; or, more commonly, using some other technique. A simple non-map method might be using ‘beacons’, which could involve eyesight, or perhaps the sense of smell or even hearing. A more complex method might be ‘Path Integration’, also known as Dead Reckoning or DR, which involves measuring how far and how fast one is travelling and in what direction; while taking account of changes while en‑route. However, DR accuracy get worse with time. The most impressive and best studied animal user of DR is the Desert Ant, which lives in burrows in bleak, desert salt-pans. They come out to hunt in extreme heat, looking for live or dead prey, zig-zagging all over the place over 10s of metres; then carry the prey in a straight line back to their very small burrow entrance. The ants have been found to have a special part of their eyes that detects the polarization patterns of sunlight, and they do use a time-compensated sun-compass sense, but this would not locate their nest; so, they seem to have an odometer sense too, as they now how far they have gone. They have a keen sense of smell, can detect the wind direction and are also brilliant at landmark. The ants achieve all this with a very small brain containing perhaps 400 thousand neurons! (For comparison, a human brain has roughly 85 billion neurons).

What other experiments caught your imagination?

One of my favourite researchers that I interviewed is Eric Warrant, an Australian working at the University of Lund in Sweden, He and his colleague Marie Dacke are famous for their research with nocturnal insects, and especially the nocturnal African Dung Beetle. On finding a dung heap, the beetles grab some dung and sculpt it into a sphere; then, grasping the ball in their rear legs, roll it backwards to a place where they can lay eggs in the ball and bury it. However, they have a competitive streak, and often ‘mug’ others and steal their balls of dung!  This means that the beetles need to move quickly, and despite it being night, they go in a straight line – but how do they manage this? It has been shown by experimentation that the beetles can detect the polarization patterns of moonlight. However, it was discovered later that they can still get straight to their nests when there is no moonlight. Then, it was realised that given the unpolluted air in the Kalahari Dessert, the Milky Way is usually visible. Further experiments conducted in an observatory, confirmed that the beetles were using its orientation to navigate.

Turning to your book ‘Sextant’: when was the earliest known use of Heavenly Bodies for navigation?

Evidence from prehistoric times suggests that the earliest navigators must have been using the Sun and stars in some way. During scientific expeditions in the Pacific in the 2nd half of the eighteenth century, Bougainville, Cook and others were very impressed by the navigational skills of Polynesian islanders. Research in the 60s & 70s showed that they could travel in the order of 2000 miles in their large canoes and still be able to locate a small island without recourse to any navigation tools or charts. These expert navigators could remember the rising points on the horizon of many stars, and used these to enable them maintain a steady course at night. They were also using other clues like swell patterns in the sea caused by islands over the horizon; and even the type of birds they were seeing. Their skills were truly remarkable.

You made your own journey across the Atlantic Ocean on a small yacht; how did this change your ability to navigate using the sky?

Colin McMullen, a retired naval officer, invited me to join him on his 35 ft ‘Saxon’ class yacht ‘Saecwen’ for a trans-Atlantic cruise, when I was only 19. I had been fascinated by the idea of celestial navigation for some time, and Colin taught me how to use the sextant. In the last 20 years or so, there has been a navigation revolution; instead of celestial and natural world observations, using our senses combined with reasonable inferences; we can now use GNSS and know our position with no intellectual effort at all! However, by becoming too dependent on technology, we are losing something very valuable. The RIN is very concerned about the extreme vulnerability of GNSS; satellite signals are very easy to jam, and now to spoof too, resulting in false positions! But more profoundly, our increasing dependency on these systems is affecting our relationship with the world around us and even our spiritual health, as described in both books.

With that in mind, what do you think the future holds for instruments like traditional sextants, compasses and charts?

The traditional answer is that we should go on learning those skills as a ’safety net’, because the electronic stuff might go down, or there might be a solar storm or lightning. That’s right; but I also think you would actually be missing out on a rewarding aspect of sailing. If you are not already adept, I would recommend getting into it; and it’s a lot easier now because there are ‘Apps’ which do all the maths and reduce the workload a lot. However, we still need to be able to take a sight, which is a real skill. Learn celestial navigation for fun and enter into a much more profound and spiritually rewarding relationship with the world around you!

What are the key virtues of the Sextant itself, compared to Quadrants and  other earlier instruments?

A sextant measures bigger angles: up to about 120 degrees, but it uses the same ideas as the earlier Quadrant. It was invented in the 1750s to enable sailors to make use of the Moon & Sun, and calculate the ‘Lunar Distance’ to determine Longitude; a breakthrough at the time! You could pick up a very old instrument and still be able to use it today. Accurate and robust; it’s an instrument that opens a gate into infinity! My book brings the sextant to life.

“I want to draw you back to 1714, when the Longitude Act established a prize of up to £20,000 for someone who could demonstrate determining longitude.”

To explain the significance of the problem, Latitude could be determined accurately, eg by measuring the altitude of Polaris. However, astronomical tables are needed to use the Sun, and the earliest tables of solar declination appeared in the late fifteenth century. So, in the early sixteenth century, on the great voyages of Portuguese and Spanish captains, they had to be very cautious when sailing out of sight of land, because their Longitude wasn’t known. The various great naval powers offered prizes to try to solve the longitude problem, and two solutions emerged.  One was Harrison’s Chronometer, described in detail in the book ”Longitude” by Dana Sobell; but this was only part of the story, as chronometers were hugely expensive and very unreliable. Captain Cook carried several valuable chronometers, but they could go wrong, or start to be fast or slow. The 2nd solution was to use ‘Lunars’ which were popular from around 1760 to the 1840s; nowadays there’s even an ‘App’ for Lunars!

“Are there any animal navigation methods which don’t require any sense of knowing time, or is time something which is essential?”

Yes: using Beacons doesn’t need time; also, using a scent trail doesn’t need time; so, many animals don’t use time. Also, it’s not necessary to have a super-accurate idea of time; eg, a time-compensated sun-compass sense just has to be good enough; but time seems essential for many navigational challenges.

“I agree on the desirability of learning to use a sextant, but with an understanding of the shortcomings of GPS, it does enable sailing in areas which you wouldn’t have been able to go to before; eg remote Pacific islands, or when navigating under cloud cover.”

Yes, for parts of the world like the Amazon or for small atolls or islands in the Pacific which aren’t accurately charted, or with adverse weather, having access to GPS enables visits that were too difficult or dangerous in the past.

“Would the debate about over-dependency on GPS and having to learn traditional methods, have had a parallel when ‘new-fangled’ chronometers were invented by Harrison?“

When the Royal Navy tried to impose a requirement to learn new methods of navigation using chronometers, it met a lot of resistance from traditionalist masters.

“Watching films with my grand-daughters, there’s a Disney film called ‘Moana’ with a lot of discussion about finding your way across the Pacific using the waves. Isn’t that a good thing to tell children about“?

Yes; as mentioned, there was a special cadre of Polynesians that did this.

“I read about a breed of moths in Australia that live in location A, but fly thousands of miles to location B to breed; then they die, but the offspring make their way back home to location A. How can that be possible?”

My favourite insect, the Bogong Moth lives in Queensland until the Summer heat arrives, then migrates South to the Snowy Mountains in New South Wales, covering distances of over 1000 Km. The moths hide in crevices and go into suspended animation; but at the end of the Summer they don’t die, it’s the same moths that return to Queensland, making the round trip over 2000 Km.  I spent time with researcher Eric Warrant and joined in some experiments, described in ‘Incredible Journeys’; the moths have a magnetic-compass sense enabling them to accurately set a course and in addition, they use the Milky Way.

“If the moths were moved by scientists to a new location, would they identify with the new location, or the old one?”

Translocation hasn’t been tried with Bogong Moths, but it has been with some bird species.  Birds mostly use their magnetic sense, the nocturnal migrants have a star-compass, some birds also use their sense of smell and some may also use infrasound. Experiments have shown that Reed Warblers can find their way back to their destination if displaced from their migration route, but only if they have migrated before; juvenile birds can’t do this!

“How do Homing Pigeons get home?”

Pigeons have a time-compensated sun-compass, a magnetic sense; and they can recognise landmarks around their lofts, and out to about 10-15 Km from the loft. However, even if they are anaesthetised and moved in a sealed box, they can still usually find their way back from, say, 300 km away! This question has puzzled scientists for many years, and about 40 years ago, it was shown that the birds only returned if their sense of smell was intact; but this seemed preposterous!  Hundreds of experiments showed that olfaction was important at both long and short distances, although other factors may also have been involved, and Pigeons might be able to detect the signature infrasound of their loft location.

“How can domestic Cats and Dogs find their old home, after a house move?”

In the last 2 or 3 years, there has been some new research in the Czech Republic; it seems that Hunting Dogs can use two navigation methods: a magnetic compass sense, and their sense of smell. They stand for a while, aligned with the earth’s magnetic field before setting off on a course. They may, like humans, have a map sense too!

“What unsolved animal navigation questions are there?”

The methods of magneto-reception are largely unknown. A huge amount of effort is going into trying to understand this. It is also fascinating how tracking studies have shown that marine mega-fauna, like whales and sharks, make breathtakingly accurate migrations and returns across vast oceans, using unknown methods.

“Please comment on Anthropocentrism”

This is the idea that we humans are the most important things on the planet. However, other creatures often astound in their capabilities, and exceed human ones in some areas. The more we can recognise that we are only a part of creation and that we are ‘all in it together’ with millions of other species, the better. One advantage of all this study of animal navigation is realising that we are not the most special animal, after all!

 

 

Tags:  African Dung Beetle  Animal Navigation  Astro-Navigation  Bogong Moth  Desert Ant  DR  GPS Vulnerability  Hinting Dog  Homing Pigeon  Incredible Journeys  Monarch Butterfly  Sextant 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Calling Outdoor Adventurers!

Posted By Prof Terry Moore, 22 December 2021

Outdoor Adventure by Prof Terry Moore


I am sure you will recall my recent presidential columns over the last few years in Navigation News, often related to my own outdoor adventures.  On a number of occasions I also commented on the sometimes dangerous over-reliance on smartphone-based mapping and guidance, and the lack of knowledge and awareness of people venturing into the great outdoors.  I also ‘suggested’ that I thought it would be appropriate for a Special Interest Group to be formed within the RIN to champion the navigational aspects of outdoor adventure and leisure activities.  Although a number of people came forward to volunteer to become involved no natural leader emerged to take the initiative further. Well now that I have handed over the presidential chalice to Cynthia I will accept my own challenge and I will try and take this nascent group forward.  


So what is the idea?  Well let’s form a group within the RIN for all those who are interested in a whole range of outdoor adventure activities to share our experiences and promote good navigational practices.  And what do I mean by outdoor adventure (and leisure) activities?  A whole diverse range of outdoor sports including: walking, hill walking, mountaineering, scrambling, climbing, running, fell running, orienteering, endurance racing, cycling (road, gravel, cross, mountain and endurance), coasteering, canyoning, skiing (downhill and cross-country), pot-holing, scuba-diving, canoeing, kayaking, paddle-boarding, paragliding, hang-gliding, micro-light flying, etc., I hope you get the idea.  If I have missed out your activity then please do let me know.  We are looking to attract both individuals and organisations.  Are you involved in the Alpine Clubs, the British Mountaineering Council (BMC), the British Orienteering Federation (BOF), the Scouts etc.; are you a Mountain Leader, a guide, and instructor; an outdoor centre; or the absolutely critical, and life-saving, rescue teams?  Do you provide equipment or services to the outdoor industry?  Or do you just enjoy the great outdoors for your own personal adventure and leisure.  Well if the answer to any of these question is yes, then please, please get in touch and let’s make this new SIG (Special Interest Group) a great forum for us all to meet, to share our experiences, and hopefully to further the knowledge of navigation across all our adventures.

The plan is to pull together a group of enthusiastic volunteers to start organising the Outdoor Adventure SIG, to discuss our thoughts and to start to plan the initial activities and meetings.  We would love to hear from you if you are interested in joining the group and especially if you wish to join the initial steering committee to get things rolling.  Let’s do it!


To get involved please contact admin@rin.org.uk

 

Tags:  outdoor adventure  special interest group 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 11 of 18
 |<   <<   <  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  >   >>   >| 
* Item includes VAT at 20% payable on UK orders.