RIN Blog
Blog Home All Blogs

New Book: Position, Navigation, and Timing Technologies in the 21st Century (“PNT21”)

Posted By Jade Morton, 07 December 2020
Updated: 02 November 2020

by Jade Morton, Frank van Diggelen, Bradford Parkinson

After more than five years of hard work by 131 authors from 18 countries, “Position, Navigation, and Timing Technologies in the 21st Century” (“PNT21”) is finally ready to meet the readers. Published by Wiley-IEEE Press, and written by world-renowned experts, PNT21 offers uniquely comprehensive coverage of the latest developments in the field of PNT .

PNT21 is a two-volume set containing 64 chapters organized into six parts. Volume 1 focuses on satellite navigation systems, technologies, and applications. It starts with a historical perspective of GPS and other related PNT development. Vol 1 Part A consists of 12 chapters on fundamentals and latest developments of global and regional satellite navigation systems (GNSS and RNSS), the need for their coexistence and mutual benefits, signal quality monitoring, satellite orbit and time synchronization, and satellite- and ground-based augmentation systems that provide information to improve the accuracy of navigation solutions. Part B contains 13 chapters on recent progress in satellite navigation receiver technologies such as vector processing, assisted and high sensitivity GNSS, precise point positioning (PPP) and real time kinematic (RTK) systems, direct position estimation techniques, and GNSS antennas and array signal processing. Also: the challenges of multipath-rich urban environments, in handling spoofing and interference, and in ensuring PNT integrity. Part C finishes the volume with 8 chapters on satellite navigation for engineering and scientific applications. A review of global geodesy and reference frames set the stage for discussions on the broad field of geodetic sciences, followed by a chapter on GNSS-based time and frequency distribution. Three chapters are dedicated to severe weather, ionospheric effects, and hazardous event monitoring. Finally, comprehensive treatments of GNSS radio occultation and reflectometry are provided.

Volume 2 addresses PNT using alternative signals and sensors and integrated PNT technologies for consumer and commercial applications. An overview chapter provides the motivation and organization of the volume, followed by a chapter on nonlinear estimation methods which are often employed in navigation system modeling and sensor integration. Vol 2 Part D devotes 7 chapters to PNT from various radio signals-of-opportunity transmitted from sources on the ground, from aircraft, or from low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites. In Part E, there are 8 chapters covering a broad range of non-radio frequency sensors operating in passive and active modes to produce navigation solutions, including MEMS inertial sensors, advances in clock technologies, magnetometers, imaging, LiDAR, digital photogrammetry, and signals received from celestial bodies. A tutorial-style chapter on GNSS/INS integration methods is included in this Part E. Also included in Part E are chapters on the neuroscience of navigation and animal navigation. Finally, Part F presents a collection of contemporary PNT applications such as surveying and mobile mapping, precision agriculture, wearable systems, automated driving, train control, commercial unmanned aircraft systems, aviation, satellite orbit determination and formation flying, and navigation in the unique Arctic environment.

Because of the diverse authorship and topics covered in PNT21, the chapters were written in a variety of styles. Some offer high-level reviews of progress in specific subject areas, while others are tutorials. A few chapters include links to MatLab or Python example code as well as test data for readers who desire hands-on practice. The collective goal is to appeal to industry professionals, researchers, and academics involved with the science, engineering, and application of PNT technologies. A website (pnt21book.com) provides downloadable code examples, data, homework problems, select high-resolution figures, errata, and a way for readers to provide feedback.

If you wish to purchase this book through www.wiley.com you can use a discount code for 30% off - please use code: VBS10 between 21st October and 31st December 2020.


Tags:  navigation  new book  PNT  position navigation and timing  technology 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

UK Sailor Preparing for the Golden Globe Race 2022 Becomes RIN Associate Fellow

Posted By Paul Hankey, 25 November 2020

Ian Herbert-Jones, a UK sailor, who is preparing for the Golden Globe Race 2022, has become an Associate Fellow of the Royal Institute of Navigation (RIN).

The Golden Globe Race (GGR) is an incredibly challenging solo, non-stop and unassisted adventure sailing race around the world, using only traditional boats and navigation. The race commences in September 2022 from Les Sables-d'Olonne, France.

The GGR commemorates the original Sunday Times Golden Globe Race in 1968-69, in which Sir Robin-Knox Johnston completed the first non-stop, solo circumnavigation. The race is unique in being the longest endurance event in sport with competitors being alone at sea for up to nine months and travelling about 30,000 miles, while only using traditional boats and traditional navigation; so that’s paper charts and celestial navigation. Each race boat, however, will be equipped with the latest modern safety equipment, including emergency positioning beacons, satellite phones, and a live race tracker, that audiences can follow online. The competitors at sea will have no access to GPS information, except in the case of an emergency. See more about the Golden Globe Race 2022 at https://goldengloberace.com/ggr-2022/.


Ian is an amateur adventure sailor, with a fulltime day job. He has 25 years and over 40,000 miles sailing experience, having completed one circumnavigation in the Clipper Round the World Yacht Race in 2008. His sailing base or the GGR campaign will be Pwllheli in North Wales on the Irish Sea.

He first learned to sail while serving with the British Army over 20 years ago, where he served as avionics engineer in the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers. He is currently an international business executive, working as the Chief Revenue Officer at Shiftboard Inc and has spent most of his career in the mobile telecommunications industry. Ian is married and has three teenage children.

Ian said “I’m really honoured to become an Associate Fellow of the Royal Institute of Navigation and I am excited about meeting the RIN members and participating in the virtual and in-person events. The Golden Globe Race is a huge challenge with traditional values of seamanship and navigation skills at its core, so I look forward to sharing the adventure and learning from the advice and experience of other members”.

We also hope to invite Ian in some speaking events online in the spring 2021 and in-person events once COVID subsides.


Ian’s campaign for the GGR is well underway. He has already purchased a proven race boat, named Puffin, a Tradewind 35, and has been busy refitting her this year in preparation for some extensive solo sea trials in 2021.

Ian has had tremendous support from many official equipment sponsors, posted at https://www.hjsailing.com/team-partners. He is currently seeking a title & team partners to sponsor him in the GGR 2022.

There are several ways to get involved and support his sailing adventure:
JOIN THE COMMUNITY. You can join the HJSailing Sailing Community to receive updates & newsletters before the race and also to follow the Live Tracker during the race itself. Registering on the HJSailing website at https://www.hjsailing.com/join-the-hj-sailing-community/.
VOLUNTEER. Although this is a solo race, it takes a team to succeed. If you are interested to volunteer, you can contact Ian at ian@hjsailing.com.
DONATE. We welcome your donation. You can contribute to this epic adventure at GoFundMe: https://uk.gofundme.com/f/hj-sailing-golden-globe-race.

We wish Ian the greatest success his incredible adventure, and we look forward to hearing about his preparation and experience in the Golden Globe Race 2022.


For more information, go to www.hjsailing.com.

Paul Hankey, Digital Marketing Lead, HJSailing Team, paul@hjsailing.com


Tags:  circumnavigation  GGR 2022  Golden Globe Race  HJSailing  Ian Herbert-Jones  solo 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Note of meeting of the International Maritime Organization Maritime Safety Committee IMO MSC102 – 4 to 11 November 2020

Posted By Kim Fisher, 17 November 2020
A meeting of the sub-committee on Navigation, Communications, Search and Rescue (NCSR) had been held in January and the next meeting of the parent committee, the Maritime Safety Committee, was then planned for May. In the event this could not be held, and MSC102 was finally arranged for November as a remote session. IMO use the platform KUDO which allows simultaneous translation for delegates which worked well. The meeting was organised as 3 hours per day over 6 days, so committee time was limited. and must have been challenging for the Chairman, Bradley Groves of Australia, who was having to work in the night. Regarding the NCSR work, the report of the January meeting was accepted but there was not time to discuss potential new work items which will be held over to the next meeting. In particular this involves potential revision of standards for Voyage Data Recorders and for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems. The meeting arranged a next meeting of NCSR for 19 to 23 April 2021. This will again be a virtual meeting with reduced time so will have a limited agenda. Priority will need to be given to the proposed revision of Chapter V (Radiocommunications) of the International Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) in order to meet the timescales for SOLAS revision. To facilitate this a special intersessional meeting of the Communications Working Group will be held in April. The meeting will report to MSC104, arranged for 4 to 8 October, as MSC103 arranged for 3 to 14 May does not give sufficient time to prepare the report. It is hoped that by 2022 committees will be back to normal and able to handle their full agendas. by Kim Fisher

Tags:  IMO  International Maritime Organisation  Maritime 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Trinity House User Consultative Committee meeting

Posted By John Hasselgren, 20 October 2020
As with so many meetings this year the THUCC met on-line via Webex. This was a new one to me, having spent many hours this year in on-line meetings using Teams, Zoom and Google Meet. However, all produced the same poor quality that I have now come to expect, a quality that as a retired professional photographer I deplore.

Following the retirement of Capt. Roger Barker as Director of Navigational Requirements the meeting was conducted by his replacement Commander Nigel Hare. Commander Hare introduced himself, a former RN Officer and QHM at Portsmouth; a round robin of introductions then followed. Interestingly there seemed to have been an increase in the attendance by those mostly interested in small craft. Apart from me there were Robin Baron from the Cruising Association, Robert Merrylees from the RNSA and Stuart Caruthers of the RYA.

Commander Hare informed the meeting that where possible Trinity House staff had been working from home during the Corona virus problem, both on the Statutory and Charity sides of the organization. The Inspection and Navigation teams had continued working with the three vessels, but in the longer term with the possibility of further restrictions, visits and engineering would become more problematic. Trinity House has not had to respond to any major incident recently. However, the proposed extension to the Thanet Windfarm has failed to receive consent, a win for the safety of navigation.

Moving on to significant events since the previous meeting, one must be the cessation of the GLAs’ Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS), introduced during the era of selective availability. The thinking, confirmed by consultation, is that today’s signals and receivers are able to meet all but the most stringent accuracy requirements. Consequently, the DGPS signals will cease to be transmitted on 31 March 2022. Many other countries have already shut down their systems.

The work to modernize Portland Bill Lighthouse is nearing completion, new lanterns having been fitted, and is undergoing assessment by the engineers before being handed back to the operations department. The lantern has a nominal range of 18 NM and the hazard-warning signal has been retained with a range of 1 NM. These hazard-warning signals, which used to be called fog signals, are becoming more of a problem as local residents resent them when they sound.

At this stage I became aware that all was not well with Webex when I was left looking at a picture of Portland Bill lighthouse although the discussion on sound had moved on. Next I had a message on screen to say that I had been disconnected and the system was attempting to re-connect me. By the time it managed this I had missed a chunk of the meeting. Happily, though, the documentation supplied in advance of the meeting shows what I had missed. The modernization of Trwyn Du and Lundy North lighthouses has commenced, but the Covid-19 pandemic is restricting this. The design phase has commenced for the modernization of both the Tater Du and St. Catherine’s lighthouses.

The deficiency rates in local harbour navigation marks inspected by TH has fallen slightly, but that for offshore structures had increased. Of 414 active AtoN relating to 34 Offshore renewable sites 307 were inspected with 53 found to be defective. However, the inspections were limited due to Storms Brendan Ciara and Dennis preventing the vessels undertaking more. As of September 2020 there are 33 operational windfarms in the coastal waters around England and Wales with 2,134 turbines. A further 264 turbines are under construction at two offshore windfarms, with 350 at four windfarms in the pre-planning stage. Three offshore windfarms have consent for 549 turbines, but are waiting for the next round of Government funding, and a further 16 windfarms, including extensions, are at the planning stage. If consented they will have in excess of 1,500 turbines. These seem mostly to be in Welsh waters, presumably English ones now reaching saturation. Trinity House is in consultation on all of these.

Martin Bransby from General Lighthouse Authority Research and Development (GRAD) then went through the things they are involved with. Resilient PNT, with GNSS being vulnerable to interference, led to trials on board TH vessels. GNSS has multiple uses on board with 13 counted in Galatea when she carried out tests. Under investigation is Absolute Radar Positioning where a transmitted radar pulse is received by an eRacon which then transmits its own Lat. and Long. to allow the ship to find its absolute position. Tests with this off Lowestoft and Southwold are able to determine position to 2.2 metres 95% of the time up to about 10 NM offshore.

By now I was back into the meeting. Research continues into the BinoNav system for taking bearings that are automatically plotted on the ECDIS. Before commercial production can take place GRAD is developing a method of automatically logging the results, which the MCA want for SAR purposes. Space based augmentation systems are being considered, especially as the UK in now excluded from Search and Rescue guarantees with the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System (EGNOS). There are currently six local augmentation systems worldwide and Martin believes that multi-system receivers will be possible. VHF Data Exchange System (VDES) is a VHF data exchange method, allowing the exchange of information between ships or between ship and shore. This will protect AIS from future overload.

Moving on to lights, Martin described means of measuring the brightness lights on AtoNs, in situ for lighthouses or in the laboratory for smaller lanterns that could be transported. They are also investigating the degradation of LEDs with age, something that I have never heard discussed before. Also described was a new ‘bomb’ LED light. This has double the number of LEDs as existing ones but uses the same current. This reduces the heat produced at the junctions by 39%, allowing the structure’s temperature to operate at 46˚C instead of 74˚C.

More on these GRAD works may be found in articles in Fairway from the past couple of years.
by John Hasselgren

This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)
 

AIS in a Historic Perspective. A History of the Identification of Ships.

Posted By Wim van der Heijden, 14 October 2020

By Wim van der Heijden, FRIN

Twenty years ago, in 2000, the Automatic Identification System (AIS) became an obligation on board of ships falling under the IMO Safety of Life at Sea(SOLAS) Convention. It took fourteen years of discussions before the decision was taken to use AIS as the one and only identification system. A discussion, which started in the vessel traffic service (VTS) Committee of IALA to overcome the identification problems in VTS controlled areas. Here, in the VTS world, we see operators, sitting behind a radar screen, to advice a ship or pilot for its behavior. But radar shows positions; there is no capability to identify a ship. The correct identification of a radar target, representing an arriving or leaving ship, is crucial to address information to the proper ship. For this purpose we saw many years of trials in several parts of the world, based on many good ideas, ending with radar and radio transponders. However, due to a lack of standardization, each organization invented its own solution based on different technologies and procedures. It became clear that any form of active co-operation with the ships was needed for an unambiguous identification suitable in the entire world. In other words, an electronic box was needed to supply the operator with the requested information.


In some areas also the ship-to-ship identification was requested to improve safety of navigation. With the identity one could address another ship by VHF radio to communicate each other’s navigational behavior.


Two different methods were proposed over time to be used for identification, both based on radio technology. In the early 1990’s the first idea was to use the addressing tool for VHF radio (channel 70), the Digital Selective Calling (DSC). This should become a part of the mandatory Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) and soon available on all ships falling under the IMO SOLAS Regulations. However, there were some concerns raised with respect to the capacity and the disturbance of GMDSS which was intended to be used as an emergency system. In spite of this, some countries started implementation of DSC based transponders for ship identification with an idea to use an additional VHF channel to increase the capacity.


In the same period the development of mobile telephones started using Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) technology. Mainly in Sweden ideas emerged to use this technology for ship identification as well. In a modified form because special facilities were needed for synchronization. The potential of this technology was promising, no limitations for the number of ships, continuously and not disturbing any other application in the VHF Maritime Mobile Band. But there were two dedicated VHF channels required for this idea.


The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in the meantime allocated two VHF frequencies from the Maritime Mobile Band for identification purposes irrelevant which technology should be chosen (today known as AIS1 and AIS2).
After many considerations and discussions at IMO the solution was to go for the last one, ending with an adaption in the SOLAS Regulations in 2000 as said before.


That was twenty years ago, reason to memorize the history of AIS and to place it in its historic perspective. Because there was a lot before we get AIS, there were many decades with a number of experiments, sometimes successful, sometimes not, and it was a good idea to go further back in history. The outcome is a book, describing AIS in its historic perspective but, as reflected in the sub-title, a history of the identification of ships. This to show the reader how our ancestors did some form of identification in the early days.


The history did not end with the acceptation in SOLAS. This was a formal and legal step based on requirements. The development to make AIS a working system could start from here. This was mainly done at IALA where a special AIS Committee, in co-operation with other international bodies like IMO, ITU and IEC, further developed the proposed technology and formulated the different types of AIS stations. Also this entire process is, when we see this today, an historic development because this should be done in just two years time. The first ships carrying AIS were expected mid-2002 and the industry needed some time for production as well. Also this process, completed with the development of a lot of documentation, is described in this book. 

The book ends with a glance to the future. New developments based on the same technology are ongoing to modernize maritime communication.
The author, as an engineer, was part of this very interesting process, mainly in the period after 2000. The first period was more a political exercise.

If you are interested in this historical overview you can order your own copy of this book which is available through IALA as publisher using the following link:
https://www/iala-aism.org/product/ais-in-a-historic-perspective


The author, Wim van der Heijden, was engaged at the Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research (TNO) from 1968 until 2005 after which he established ‘Ship Monitoring Consultancy’ for providing advice on maritime identification applications. Because of his involvement in the development of a predecessor of AIS, the Automatic Reporting and Identification System (ARIS) for the Netherlands Maritime Administration, he was asked to join the development of AIS within IALA and IEC on behalf of the Netherlands Administration. He was chair of the IALA AIS Technical Working Group from 2004 until 2010. This group was responsible for all AIS related questions in the IALA e-Navigation Committee. Wim is Honorary Member of IALA (2010), Fellow of the Royal Institute of Navigation (RIN) and member of the Netherlands Institute of Navigation (NIN).


This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 13 of 18
 |<   <<   <  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18
* Item includes VAT at 20% payable on UK orders.