RIN Blog
Blog Home All Blogs

Get Lost – Spatial Disorientation in Dementia

Posted By Hannah Sherrard, 31 July 2023

Get Lost – Spatial Disorientation in Dementia

 

Prof Michael Hornberger sheds light on the link between spatial disorientation and dementia, highlighting the significance and impact of this in the real world. Michael is Professor of Applied Dementia Research at Norwich Medical School, UK. This article was first published in the July/August 2023 Navigation News.

Getting lost in an unfamiliar environment is a common occurrence for the vast majority of people. For example, we can easily get lost and have difficulty finding our bearings when on holiday in a new town. This can be amusing, in particular when we pass the same place for the third time, but it can be also quite unsettling and distressing when we get completely lost. Such ‘getting lost’ scenarios are very common for people with dementia, who often have difficulties finding their bearings even in highly familiar locations. It might come as a surprise to many people that such spatial disorientation is a key symptom in dementia, since we would assume that memory problems are the key early symptom. Spatial disorientation is actually as common as memory problems, but is under-recognised since it is often not noticed by family members, and is rarely inquired about as a symptom by clinicians and healthcare professionals. To better understand why spatial disorientation occurs in dementia, we need to understand how the brain is affected by the dementia disease processes. 



Dementia is an umbrella term for different dementias, with Alzheimer’s disease accounting for 60-70% of cases with dementia. It is thought that Alzheimer’s disease is caused by the build-up of two proteins (amyloid and tau) in the brain. The exact reason why these proteins accumulate and cause the disease is not yet fully established. However, once the two proteins accumulate, they start becoming toxic to the nerve cells and subsequently nerve cells start dying. It is this dying of nerve cells which causes the symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease, since the brain cannot conduct its functions properly anymore once the nerve cells are gone. 

For dementia diagnosis, spatial orientation changes can potentially complement the reported memory problems, which helps to confirm the diagnosis. This is particularly useful, since many people report changes to their memory as they age, while healthy people would rarely report having problems with orientation.

Read the full article here

Learn more about the symptoms and warning signs of dementia on the Alzheimer Research UK website 

Author

Prof Michael Hornberger

Professor of Applied Dementia Research, Norwich Medical School

Michael's book ‘Tangled Up – The science and history of Alzheimer’s disease’ is available here.


CogNav Sig logo

RIN Cog Nav Special Interest Group

https://cognavrin.org.uk/

 

 

 Attached Files:

Tags:  Alzheimer Research Project  CogNav  Dementia  NavNews 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Note of meeting of the International Maritime Organization Maritime Safety Committee IMO MSC107 – 31 May to 9 June 2023

Posted By Kim Fisher, 12 July 2023

Note of meeting of the International Maritime Organization Maritime Safety Committee IMO MSC107 – 31 May to 9 June 2023


This was a full length eight-day meeting of the Committee as, being Assembly year, it will be the only meeting this year. It was very well attended with 1300 delegates registered and chaired by Mrs Mayte Medina of the USA. It was the first meeting since the pandemic that there were no left-over documents from previous meetings but had attracted 122 submissions including 22 proposals for new work.

Concerns were raised about unannounced missile launches by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea which were creating a threat to international shipping when debris fell into the sea. This resulted in a new resolution being drafted on Strengthening measures for ensuring the safety of international shipping.

Concerns were also raised about the Russian Federation issuing seafarers certificates from ports in Ukraine where the Ukrainian administration was unable to operate. There was doubt about the validity of these certificates and Member States were encouraged to prevent such unlawful practices by the Russian Federation.

Work continued on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) towards developing a voluntary MASS Code for cargo ships. The Correspondence Group reported on its work and a meeting of a Joint MSC/LEG/FAL working group incorporating the Legal and Facilitation Committees and a meeting of a Intersessional working group reported. A new draft of the Code was prepared and work will continue in the Correspondence Group and the Intersessional working group. The Joint working group will meet after next year’s meetings of the Legal and Facilitation Committees.

Draft amendments to Chapter V (Safety of Navigation) of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) were approved with regard to reporting the loss of containers at sea.

The urgent issues from the meeting of the sub-committee on Navigation, Communications, Search and Rescue (NCSR) which had taken place two weeks previously were agreed particularly the revised date of 1 January 2028 for installations of new radio equipment which will now be promulgated in a Circular.

After considerable discussion new work was agreed on development of a safety regulatory framework to support the reduction of GHG emissions from ships using new technologies and alternative fuels and a correspondence group was set up to be coordinated by the USA. Further new work items were agreed for; a revision of the guidelines on cyber risk management (MSC.FAL.1/Circ3), development of guidelines for software maintenance, development of guidelines for EPIRBs two-way communication, development of measures to prevent loss of containers at sea, revision of performance standards for gyro compasses, revision of the IMO standard communication phrases (SMCP), revision of performance standards for BeiDou satellite navigation system, development of performance standards for satellite-based augmentation systems and identification of measures to improve the security and integrity aspects of the Automatic Identification System (AIS). The Committee agreed that with this workload there should be a moratorium on submissions of proposals for new work at the next meeting.

The meeting noted the recent death of Dr Jim Coley who was the representative of Vanuatu for many years in the 1990s. The meeting bade farewell to the Secretary-General, Kitok Lim, whose 8 year term ends this year and Fred Kenney the Director of the Legal Affairs and External Relations Division who is retiring.

The next meeting has been scheduled for 15 to 24 May 2024. A meeting of the intersessional working Group on MASS has been scheduled for 30 October to 3 November 2023. The next meeting of NCSR has been scheduled for 4 to 13 June 2024.
 

Tags:  IMO  International Maritime Organization  Maritime  Maritime Navigation Group  Maritime safety  MNG  Safety at sea 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

New technologies present new challenges to PNT - the RIN PNT Advisory Group Executive Committee meeting had a lot to cover at its 23rd May meeting.

Posted By Andy Proctor and Guy Buesnel, 26 June 2023

New technologies present new challenges to PNT - the RIN PNT Advisory Group Executive Committee meeting had a lot to cover at its 23rd May meeting.  

UK PNT Advisory Group (PAG) Chair Andy Proctor and PAG Secretary Guy Buesnel report on the committees wide-ranging discussions.

The PNT Advisory Group Executive Committee met last month online; the topics discussed include:
Advances in Quantum technologies for PNT
The rise of Artificial Intelligence
PNT in Automation/autonomous systems 
The role of PNT Standards or Guidance in improving systems or equipment resilience 
Developing a communications strategy for the committee
Improving committee participation and International Reach 
Forthcoming RIN Defence Seminar at Aerospace Bristol
Following up the recent LEO event
A review of PNT Advisory Group Activities

Defence PNT

An area focussed on was the forthcoming RIN Defence Seminar at Aerospace Bristol on 03 July.  The MoD wants to reconnect with companies and individuals in the Defence Sector on PNT matters. RIN and the Advisory Group has developed a one-day programme of talks and discussion to enable discussions and networking. The event is especially important given the recent news stories detailing how an inertial navigation sensor has undergone trials on a Royal Navy warship.

The Seminar’s focus will be on 
What is meant by "resilient PNT" and "assured PNT"?
How should threats and hazards be considered?
Development of requirements for defence PNT systems
Approaches to assessing risks at different levels from modules to integrated systems
Mitigation approaches and their relative/absolute effectiveness
Research and development challenges
Latest developments in PNT for defence applications

The programme will have presentations from MoD and DSTL personnel in the morning and two panel discussions in the afternoon session. The event moderator is the RIN PNT Advisory Group Chair, Andy Proctor


The talks will include: -
Keynote: Wing Cdr Mark Brammer, MOD
Briefing from Strategic Command, Space Capability Planning (SATCOM & PNT) - Al Harris, PNT Desk Officer
Briefing from DSTL on their activities - Rob Handley, Acting Chief PNT Scientist
Briefing from DE&S - Jonathan Wilson
Briefing from DSC on their activity - Stuart Snedden, Space Team, UK Defence Solutions Centre

The afternoon panel discussions will concentrate on “Threats and Disruptions” and “Systems Thinking/Infrastructure protection”.

The last few places for this event are available here:  https://rin.org.uk/events/EventDetails.aspx?id=1748439

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) PNT

The Advisory Group discussed how best to follow up the recent RIN LEO PNT Seminar. RIN hosted the event in March 2023 to encourage a discussion and debate, under “Chatham House rules”, to discuss the technical, value chain, resilience, and business model challenges of providing PNT services from large satellite constellations. The event centred around open discussion, independence, and the objective of bringing the challenges forward for debate. 
These challenges include frequency selection, orbit determination and prediction accuracy (noted by a few attendees as “hard for LEO”); concept of operation (doppler or time-of-arrival), and the integration with other, linked services (independence and interoperability). 
Of greater concern in the room was the lack of clear business models from most of the LEO PNT providers. That is understandable as companies are reluctant to expose their models in front of their competitors. But there was less clarity in the room about why someone would pay for additional PNT services from space.

Approximately 100 people attended in person from over 40 organisations, UK and beyond, spanning users, service providers, equipment manufacturers and government officials.

The Advisory Group noted that a follow up by RIN is needed as the one-day seminar attracted some very lively debate and argument and succeeded in highlighting several key areas where significant challenges remain.

“Standards damn Standards”

The role of standards or guidance in increasing the resilience of systems or equipment is being discussed with the PAG preparing a white paper in this area. Its author Ramsey Farragher had opened the paper up to contributions from the rest of the executive committee. 

RIN PAG Chair Andy Proctor outlined the evolving US IEEE P1952 standard and its focus on resilience levels.  He speculated as to whether this approach would succeed in adding value to the PNT community but also stated that there was a need for intervention, be it a standard, guidance or even a code of conduct.  An analysis of the US Resilience Conformance Framework would be part of developing the correct intervention.

The meeting noted it is necessary to help users assess their current levels of resilience – there is nothing available to support presently.  This links to the other PAG activity on if there is a need for a UK PNT test bed, which is being consulted upon. The “standards” report is nearly completed and the executive committee discussed whether an RIN event on standards to coincide with the release of the document, would be worth considering. 

This blog invites recipients to feedback to the RIN on if a seminar on PNT standards/guidance/best practice would be welcomed. Please contact RIN Communications and Events Manager Clare Stead at comms@rin.org.uk with any feedback

Ensuring better communications

The group Secretary Guy Buesnel also presented plans to develop a coherent communications strategy for the RIN PAG which could be widely used to achieve consistency and greater reach for the group, including keeping members on the mailing list up to date.

The Committee also unanimously decided to issue approve the admission of Mitch Narins FRIN to the PNT Advisory Committee Exec team.  Mitch has been a prolific contributor to the work of the RIN and to developing Systems thinking for achieving PNT resilience and in developing usable standards to improve PNT Resilience. Mitch was employed with the FAA for more than 26 years, becoming Chief Systems Engineer for Navigation Services. He is also an Adjunct Professor at George Washington University, a member of the editorial advisory board for GPS World, magazine, a member of the Corporate Faculty at Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, is a Fellow of the RIN and is now the Principal Consultant and owner of Strategic Synergies, LLC.  Mitch will bring a wealth of industrial and academic expertise to the committee as well as a US perspective on Resilient PNT affairs.
The PNT Advisory Group always welcomes suggestions and inputs on PNT matters, large or small. Feel free to get in touch. 

Andy and Guy. 

 

Tags:  LEO  Low Earth Orbit Satellites  PNT  Positioning Navigation and Timing  resilient pnt  RIN PNT Advisory Group  RIN Special Interest Group 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Note on a meeting of the International Maritime Organization sub-committee on Navigation, Communications, Search and Rescue

Posted By Kim Fisher, 05 June 2023

IMO NCSR10: 10 – 19 May 2023

The meeting of the sub-committee on Navigation, Communications, Search and Rescue (NCSR) was held under the chairmanship Nigel Clifford of New Zealand. This was the first in person meeting since Covid so there was more time available to catch up on items which had been deferred. The agenda still proved to be quite challenging however and some items could not be completed for lack of time. Some hybrid working possible was possible for members who were unable to attend in person.

A document had been received from Ukraine expressing concerns on the Russian Federation's actions impacting the functioning of Ukraine's system of navigational and hydrographic support of shipping in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. This led to considerable debate although some of the issues raised were outside of the scope of the sub-committee. In conclusion Member States were encouraged to ensure that the functioning of key navigational aids and systems was protected at all times and particularly during any conflict situation in order to guarantee the safety of international shipping and protect the lives of seafarers.

Following the work of the last meeting in preparing revised performance standards for the electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS), amendments were agreed to add a requirement for standardised digital exchange of ship’s route plans. No input had been received on proposals to amend the performance standards for the Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) so this item was deleted from the work programme.

There was considerable discussion on proposals to amend SOLAS to improve the safety of pilot transfer arrangements. The way forward was concluded to be the development of a new resolution containing performance standards and this task was referred to a correspondence group led by China.

Maritime Safety Information (MSI) Providers

The issue of increased costs for Maritime Safety Information (MSI) providers as new GMDSS satellite service providers are recognised in addition to Inmarsat had been referred by the last meeting to a correspondence group led by Australia. The group had defined a number of options but none of the options could offer a perfect outcome. The issue will now be referred to the Maritime Safety Committee for further advice. Revisions were prepared to the Iridium SafetyCast service manual, the Joint IMO/IHO/WMO Manual on Maritime Safety Information and MSC.1/Circ.1610 concerning the description of maritime services in the context of e-navigation. Proposals to revise the criteria for the provision of new GMDSS satellite service providers (resolution A.1001(25)) received from a correspondence group set up by the last meeting were referred back to the group led by France.

Various liaison statements to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) were prepared concerning the IMO position for the next ITU World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC 23); proposals to modify the recommendation M.1371-5 for the Automatic Identification System (AIS), issues on coding of emergency indicating radio beacons (EPIRBs), and digital selective calling alarms relating to bridge alert management.

The meeting noted information provided by radio manufacturers that it would not be realistic to produce new GMDSS radios in time for deadline of installations after 1 January 2024. Proposals were prepared for the Committee to consider a revised date of 1 January 2028. COMSAR/Circ.32 relating to the availability of radio equipment was revised following experience of its use.

The issue of unlawful practices associated with the manipulation of data transmissions from the automatic identification system (AIS) and tampering of AIS transponders was discussed with a view to possibly identifying improved technical arrangements.

Some items had been received but were not considered to be sufficiently mature to be actioned. Proposals for performance standards for NAVDAT, intended to be a possible replacement for NAVTEX, were referred to the next meeting. Proposals for generic performance standards for shipborne satellite navigation system receiver equipment were referred back to the correspondence group led by Germany. Proposals for the introduction of a VHF data exchange system (VDES) were referred to a correspondence group led by Japan.

There were no ship’s routeing proposals submitted to the meeting. A UK proposal for a new mandatory reporting system in the Pentland Firth, which was not agreed at the previous meeting, was agreed as a voluntary system. Associated protective measures within a particularly sensitive sea area in the North-Western Mediterranean Sea were prepared to protect cetaceans. The chair of the Experts Group on Ship’s Routeing, George Detweiller of the USA, announced that this would be his last meeting as he was retiring. He had chaired the group since NCSR4.

Upcoming Meetings Relating To Maritime Safety

The next meeting of NCSR is planned for 4 to 13 June 2024. A meeting of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 107) is planned for 31 May to 9 June 2023. A meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group is planned for 9 to 13 October 2023. A meeting of the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group is planned for 6 to 10 November 2023. The meeting proposed to invite the Committee to authorize the holding of annual meetings of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group and the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group in future until advised otherwise.

Tags:  IMO  International Maritime Organization  Maritime  Navigation  NCSR  SAR  Search and Rescue 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Antares Charts – Report of a presentation by Bob Bradfield

Posted By John Hasselgren, 27 January 2023
The Little Ship Club hosted the Small Craft Group’s evening presentation by Bob Bradfield at its London Headquarters on 17th. January. Bob specialises in producing charts of areas in the West Coast of Scotland that are not recently surveyed by UKHO or inadequately detailed for yachtsmen seeking out of the way anchorages.

Bob explained that the West Coast of Scotland is a wonderful area to sail and explore, especially if you can choose your weather. He had been sailing in high latitudes but then realised that he did not need to go so far to find excellent anchorages and scenery.

But why the West Coast of Scotland? Firstly, it is a huge area, some 125 nm x 300 nm, with most of it sheltered from ocean swells. There are sandy beaches and rocky coves surrounded by magnificent hill scenery. Add to this the number of small channels and anchorages and, of course, there is an abundance of wildlife. However, there were no charts suitable for yachtsmen of these inshore areas. So, he decided to make his own.

The UKHO standard charts of the area, Bob explained, were fine for passage making from island to island, but they lacked the detail for more adventurous sailing and accessing small, isolated coves. Even Pilot Books, although better than standard charts, gave only sparse information. The Clyde Cruising Club pilots and Imray charts were fine for a sunny day with good visibility but could let you down in rain or on a foggy day, with recommended transits between a building and the background hills being hidden.

UKHO charts of these inshore areas were often drawn from very old surveys, often from the 19th. century done by lead line. When these were made the positioning technique was far from the accuracy expected today and there were occasional omissions or misrepresentations. We were show a UKHO chart from1985 (not so old as some) and a comparison with its correction – a 0.7 metre sounding lurking in a 5.2 metre area!

To make a chart Bob starts with Ordnance Survey details of the shore and HW line as a background. He then surveys this basic outline with a single beam echo sounder using DGPS for accurate positioning. Extra detail is added to the chart as it is found. A final check is made with side scan sonar. At the same time a tide gauge is set up on a prominent solid location so that accurate tidal heights can be determined. Once tidal heights have been reduced to soundings all the data can then be incorporated into the new chart.

The Antares charts, which only cover the inshore areas explored by yachtsmen, can be run on a computer (PC or Mac), on tablets, a chart plotter or even a mobile phone. Even those without internal GPS can be used if connected via Bluetooth to a separate GPS receiver. Bob recommends the use of the Memory Map app to run his charts, although other apps can be used.

Things to be aware of:

He issues a warning that the charts have been produced by unqualified yachtsmen and suggests there will be errors – beware, use carefully, he says.

When using the charts, things can happen too quickly and GPS can lag or even stop updating. Proceed slowly when in confined waters close to shallows or rocks. He suggests that large scale charts in chart plotters plus strong tides can quickly produce a dangerous situation.  In other words, use carefully and proceed with caution!

Bob concluded by showing a UKHO chart of the area around Dunstaffnage which was alongside his own chart. He indicated five significant differences between the two, differences that could be a problem to a yacht.

A full list of the electronic charts in the package which is available for sale (and updated annually), and much more information, can be found on the web site: 

http://www.antarescharts.co.uk

The talk was greatly appreciated by the audience, which then went to dinner in the Little Ship Club. You can watch the recording of the presentation on the Little Ship Club's YouTube Channel here.
 

Tags:  charts  marine navigation  maritime  small craft group 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 9 of 18
 |<   <<   <  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  >   >>   >| 
* Item includes VAT at 20% payable on UK orders.